哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
哲学研究
SSK、后SSK与科学哲学的当代重建——回顾、思考与展望
PDF下载 ()
郑 毓 信,郑玮
(南京大学 哲学系, 江苏 南京 210093;南京航空航天大学 人文与社会科学学院, 江苏 南京 210016)
郑毓信,男,浙江镇海人,南京大学哲学系教授,博士研究生导师;郑玮,男,江苏南京市人,哲学博士,南京航空航天大学人文与社会科学学院讲师。
摘要:
结论的预设性、研究工作的“自我消解性”以及相对独立的研究问题的缺乏,极大地限制了SSK研究的发展前景。由SSK向后SSK的发展表明:我们不应停留于简单地去指明对于传统科学哲学与SSK进行辩证整合的必要性,而应努力在这一方面做出实质性的工作,并应更为深入地去思考究竟什么是科学哲学相对于实际科学活动的合理定位。我们既应明确反对各种“取消说”,同时又应高度重视如何能以外部的各种相关研究为背景实现“科学哲学的当代重建”,特别是,努力做好由“外推式发展”向“内生式发展”的必要转变,通过引入新的范畴更为深入地揭示科学的性质,切实加强科学哲学研究的反思性与开放性,更好发挥研究工作于实际科学活动的促进作用。
关键词:
SSK; 后SSK; 科学哲学
收稿日期:
2011-03-28
中图分类号:
B028
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2012)03-0041-06
基金项目:
Doi:
SSK and PostSSK and Contemporary Reconstruction of Scientific Philosophy
ZHENG Yuxin, ZHENG Wei
(Department of Philosophy, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, Jiangsu; College of Humanities and Social Sciences,Nanjing University of Aviation and Spaceflight, Nanjing 210016, Jiangsu)
Abstract:
The growth of study of SSK has been greatly restricted by such problems as presupposition of study, “selfdispelling” of research work and lack of relatively independent research problems. The transformation from SSK to postSSK shows that we should try to do something substantial and make a deeper consideration on identification of a proper scientific philosophy to practical scientific activity rather than simply point out the necessity of synthesizing traditional scientific philosophy with dialectics. Therefore, we should not only clearly oppose various “view of cancelling” but also pay close attention to how to actualize a “presentday reconstruction of scientific philosophy” under the background of varieties of external studies concerned. More importantly, we should try to do a good job of necessary transition from “externallypushing development” to “internallygenerating development” and earnestly strengthen reflection and openness of scientific philosophy study.
KeyWords:
SSK; postSSK; scientific philosophy