哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
美学研究
台港新儒家“中国艺术精神”阐释的悖论反思
PDF下载 ()
孙琪
(佛山科学技术学院 中文系, 广东 佛山528000)
孙琪,女,江苏徐州市人,文艺学博士,佛山科学技术学院中文系副教授。
摘要:
台港新儒家学者唐君毅、徐复观的“中国艺术精神”阐释共同出现了三大悖论:一是他们所谓“纯粹之艺术精神”实则无法“纯粹”,二是艺术精神与道德精神表面并列实则并不平等,三是在他们建构的“中国艺术精神”里,艺术最终被“精神”湮没,成为可有可无之物。悖论产生的最终根源在于他们标举“中国艺术精神”的指向并非艺术,而是文化精神和价值。他们以心性之学解读中国传统艺术的路向是对宋明儒学的延续,而非超越。
关键词:
台港新儒家;中国艺术精神;新儒学美学
收稿日期:
2011-08-24
中图分类号:
J12; B83-02
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2012)01-0143-08
基金项目:
教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(11YJA751050)
Doi:
A Reflection on the Paradoxical Interpretation of NeoConfucian “Spirit of Chinese Art” in Taiwan and Hong Kong
SUN Qi
(Department of Chinese Language and Literature, Foshan Institute of Science and Technology, Foshan 528000, Guangdong)
Abstract:
Tang Junyi and Xu Fuxian, the two neoConfucian scholars in Taiwan and Hong Kong, contributed an interpretation of the “spirit of Chinese art”. However, their interpretation exposes three paradoxes. First of all, their socalled “pure artistic spirit” is not “pure” at all. Secondly, artistic spirit and moral spirit appear to be parallel but are actually not equal. Finally, in the “spirit of Chinese art” reconstructed by them, art is drowned in the ocean of “spirit” in the end and becomes something of no significance. The primary reason for these paradoxes is that the “spirit of Chinese art” they advertise points to cultural spirit and values rather than art. Therefore, their interpretation of Chinese traditions by drawing on studies of mind as their guide is actually a continuation rather than excess of Confucianism in the Song and the Ming Dynasty.
KeyWords:
neoConfucian scholars in Taiwan and Hong Kong; spirit of Chinese art; neoConfucian aesthetics