哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
学术评论与争鸣
“编辑五体”与编辑学学科边界
PDF下载 ()
靳 青 万
(漳州师范学院 新闻传播系, 福建 漳州 363000)
靳青万,男,河南内乡人,漳州师范学院新闻传播系教授。
摘要:
同其他所有学科一样,编辑学也有自己的学科边界。以往编辑学界主要只研究以“编辑两体论”为主的狭义编辑学,自我划定的学科边界过于狭小,使自己的学科覆盖及学科疆域较诸实际大大缩小,因而严重影响了编辑学学科的科学性、影响力及其发展。如今必须向“编辑五体论”视域条件下的广义编辑学的应有边界拓展,重新建构其理论体系,扩大自己的学科覆盖,开拓其应有的学科疆域,发掘其实有的科学性,激发其强大的生命力,结束其原来那种孱弱无用、社会认可度低的不正常的尴尬局面。
关键词:
编辑学; 学科边界; 编辑两体论; 编辑五体论; 广义编辑学
收稿日期:
2011-06-10
中图分类号:
G232
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2011)06-0142-08
基金项目:
福建省社会科学基金项目(2008B2074); 福建省高校服务海西重点项目([2009]8)
Doi:
“Five Styles of Edition” and the Disciplinary Border of Editing Study
JIN Qingwan
(Department of News Dissemination, Zhangzhou Normal School, Zhangzhou 363000, Fujian)
Abstract:
Like other disciplines, editing science also has its academic border. The former world of editing largely studied a micro editing science based on the theory of “twostyle edition”. This delimited the scholarship of edition within a very narrow space, covering a much more limited domain than the reality did, which considerably affected the scientificity and growth of editing science. Now it is high time to extend frontier of the scholarship to a macro editing science in terms of the “theory of fivestyle edition”, reestablish its theoretical system and expand its disciplinary covering so as to exploit practical scientificity and activate strong vitality out of the editing science to bring to an end the current embarrassing situation of weak impact and low acceptability.
KeyWords:
editing science; disciplinary border; twostyle editing theory; fivestyle editing theory; macro editing science