哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
心理学研究
有关心理学史研究中几个值得思考的问题
PDF下载 ()
叶 浩 生
(广州大学 心理与脑科学研究中心, 广东 广州 510006)
叶浩生,男,江苏徐州市人,教育学博士,广州大学心理与脑科学研究中心教授,博士生导师。
摘要:
心理学史既是一种“实在”,同时也具有一定“社会建构”的特征。在心理学史上,行为主义和认知心理学并非水火不容,而是一种你中有我、我中有你的错综复杂关系。两者在科学观和方法论上有着许多一致的地方,区别只在于研究的重心有所不同。心理学史上一直存在着学科分裂问题,而多元化的心理科学观是在目前条件下解决分裂危机的较好选择。心理学的统一是多元共存的统一,多元之间维持着一种适度的紧张关系。这种适度的紧张关系促进不同研究取向的良性竞争,从而有利于心理科学的健康发展。
关键词:
心理学史; 社会建构; 行为主义; 认知心理学
收稿日期:
2011-01-26
中图分类号:
B84-09
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2011)04-0058-07
基金项目:
羊城学者首席科学家项目(10A030S)
Doi:
Several Considerable Questions in Study of History of Psychology
YE Haosheng
(Research Centre of Psychology and Brain Science, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, Guangdong)
Abstract:
A history of psychology is both a “reality” and is characteristic of “social construct”. In history of psychology, behaviourism and cognitive psychology were not really incompatible to each other but complexly related by overlapping each other. The two schools shared the scientific view and methodology and differed only in focus of concern. Therefore, a multiple psychological view should be a better choice to neutralize the current crisis of separation. This is because the integration of psychology is an integration of multiple coexistence with certain tension among multielements. The certain tension will help promote a mild competition between different orientations of psychological study to create a favorable climate for healthy development of psychology.
KeyWords:
history of psychology; social construct; behaviourism; cognitive psychology