哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国古代文学研究
走出接受史的困境——经典作家接受史研究反思
PDF下载 ()
陈 文 忠
(安徽师范大学 中国诗学研究中心, 安徽 芜湖 241000)
陈文忠,男,上海市人,安徽师范大学文学院教授,中国诗学研究中心研究员。
摘要:
经典作家接受史研究,曾几何时成了一个最缺乏学术新意的“学术避难所”。这与不少研究者缺少接受史的“问题意识”和正确方法密切相关。经典作家接受史实质是作家精神生命的“身后史”,也是接受主体与接受对象之间的多元审美对话史和多重意义生成史。从接受过程中的关注焦点、接受方式和功能效应看,经典作家接受史至少可以从五个方面展开,即经典地位的确立史,经典序列的形成史,艺术风格的阐释史,艺术典范的影响史,以及人格精神的传播史;从而由宏观到微观、由整体到局部,从创作到审美、从诗品到人品。通过对经典作家的经典地位、经典序列、艺术风格、典范影响和人格精神的传播等多元历时考察,为读者展示出一部立体的、全方位的、血肉丰满的经典作家的身后史。
关键词:
经典作家; 接受史; 接受主体; 文学研究方法
收稿日期:
2010-12-18
中图分类号:
I209
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2011)04-0026-12
基金项目:
Doi:
Breaking Away from the Dilemma of Literary Reception History——An Introspection of the Classic Writers’ Studies of Literary Reception History
CHEN Wenzhong
(Research Centre of Chinese Poetics, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241000, Anhui)
Abstract:
It is not very long before study of reception history of classic writers turned into “an academic shelter” most lacking of academic innovation. In fact, a reception history of classic writers is essentially “a history of their spiritual life beyond the grave” and also a history of multiple aesthetic dialogue between receptive subject and receptive object and a history of multiple meaning generation. In terms of focus, receptive means and functional effect, a reception history of classic writers should involve at least five specific histories, that is, a history of establishment of classic place, a history of shaping of classic sequence, a history of interpreting artistic style, a history of influence of artistic example and a history of dissemination of personal spirit. Only by a multiple and diachronic investigation of all these can we contribute to the readers an allround, stereoscopic and rich history of classic writers beyond the grave.
KeyWords:
classic writer; reception history; receptive subject; means of literary study