哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国现当代文学研究论
五四文学思想的转变及其内在矛盾
PDF下载 ()
马 俊 山
(韩国外国语大学 中文通翻译系,首尔 )
马俊山,男,河北沽源人,南京大学中国现代文学研究中心研究员,博士生导师,韩国外国语大学客座教授。
摘要:
五四时期,陈独秀的“国民文学”观与梁启超相近,实质上仍然属于晚清思想启蒙的范畴。而周作人的“人的文学”思想,才是中国文学进入现代的真正起点。从陈独秀到周作人,最重要的转变是文学主体由抽象的“国民”变成了具体的“个人”,功能指向则从“立国”转向“立人”。周作人认为,人是个别的、特殊的、灵肉一致的存在,具有至高无上的价值和意义。“人的文学”是对晚清以来文学思想的超越,反拨是必要的,矫枉过正也是可以理解的。但中国社会却没有给它一个自我调整、纠偏补正的机会,反而将其逼进更加绝对化的思想危局。周作人后来的“落水”,与之不无关系。在中国现代化进程中,如何化解个人与国家的思想紧张,至今仍然是一个值得深思的普遍问题。
关键词:
五四文学; 国民文学; 人的文学; 陈独秀; 周作人
收稿日期:
2009-05-11
中图分类号:
I206.6
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2010)05-0011-10
基金项目:
韩国外国语大学2010年研究基金(This Work Was Supported by Hankuk University of Foreign Studies Research Fund of 2010)
Doi:
On the Evolution and Internal Contradiction of the Theory of May4th Literature
MA Junshan
(Department of Chinese Mastery Translation, South Korean University of Foreign Languages, Seoul)
Abstract:
Chen Duxiu’s view of “literature of the nation” in the May4th days was similar to Liang Qichao’s, both belong to the enlightening trend in the late Qing Dynasty. In contrast, Zhou Zuoren’s theory of “literature of men” was actually the real startingpoint of Chinese literature ushering into modern times. The most significant transformations from Chen to Zhou were that of the literary subject from the abstract “nation” to the specific “individual” and that of literary function from “establishing the nation” to “establishing men”. “Literature of men” was a necessary excess and counteraction and an understandable hypercorrection to literary trends since the late Qing Dynasty. However, the current Chinese society compelled it into a more absolute ideological dilemma instead of giving it chance of selfadjustment and correction, which was partly responsible for Zhou’s “falling into the water”. In the course of Chinese modernization, how to resolve the ideological tension between nation and individuals still remains a universal problem to be deeply considered.
KeyWords:
May4th literature; national literature; human literature; Chen Duxiu; Zhou Zuoren