哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
中国古代史研究
“宋无罚金之刑”质疑
PDF下载 ()
高 叶 青
(陕西师范大学 历史文化学院, 陕西 西安 710062;陕西省社会科学院 古籍所, 陕西 西安 710065)
高叶青(1978—),女,陕西咸阳市人,陕西师范大学历史文献学博士,陕西省社会科学院助理研究员。
摘要:
沈家本《历代刑法考》提出“宋无罚金之刑”的论断不妥。宋代有罚金之刑,且适用于司法、教育、人才选拔等方面,所罚数量从6斤、8斤、10斤到100斤不等,适用罪名有失职渎职罪、擅权罪及欺诈罪等。而普遍存在于宋代的“罚铜”其实是广义层面的罚金刑,其处罚等级约有1斤、2斤、120斤等18个等级,适用范围也很广。
关键词:
宋代刑法; 罚金之刑; 罚铜之刑
收稿日期:
2008-04-20
中图分类号:
K244
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2008)05-0050-05
基金项目:
Doi:
An Inquiry into the Idea that “No Forfeit Law Was Imposed in the Song Dynasty”
GAO Yeqing
(College of History and Civilization, Shaanxi Normal University, Xian 710062, Shaanxi;Institution of Historical Relics, Shaanxi Academy of Social Sciences, Xian 710065, Shaanxi)
Abstract:
Shen Jiaben's argument in The Investigation of Criminal Laws in Chinese History that “No forfeit law was imposed in the Song Dynasty” was not very reliable. In fact, the Song Dynasty did carry out some forfeit laws, which were adopted to such cases as judicature, education, choice of talented workers. These laws were used for punishment of such crimes as malfeasance, dereliction of duty, power monopolization and deception, whose quantity of forfeit ranged from 6 through 8 and 10 to 100 catty. However, the socalled “forfeit bronze” in the day referred actually to forfeit punishment in a general sense. Such punishment divided into 18 grades and applied to very wide cases.
KeyWords:
criminal law in the Song Dynasty; forfeit punishment; bronzeforfeit penalty