哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
哲学研究
罗蒂的进步与儒家的真理
PDF下载 ()
黄勇
(宾州库兹城大学 哲学系, 美国 宾夕法尼亚州 库兹城 19530)
黄勇(1959—),男,上海市人,美国宾州库兹城(Kutztown)大学哲学系教授,美国《道:比较哲学杂志》(英文)主编,复旦大学哲学博士,美国哈佛大学神学博士。
摘要:
理查德·罗蒂(Richard Rorty)常被视为相对主义者,对此他予以了否认与回应。在否认与回应的过程中,罗蒂发展了其进步与希望的观念。罗蒂最近的进步观念与对进步的希望有了进一步的发展,并且更好地表达了两个儒家的真理:其一,道德进步就是扩展那些能被视作“我们”的人的范围;其二,要取得这样的进步,我们不必采用道德普遍主义的立场。同时,孔子与罗蒂或许存在两种可能的争论:一是差异在道德教育中的地位,二为形而上学在道德进步中的作用。对争论讨论的结论是,罗蒂式的儒家会是更好的儒家,儒家式的罗蒂会是更好的罗蒂。
关键词:
理查德·罗蒂; 相对主义; 道德进步; 道德形上学
收稿日期:
2006-09-20
中图分类号:
B565
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2007)03-0018-12
基金项目:
Doi:
Progress of Rorty and Truth of Confucianism
HUANG Yong
(Departmen of Philosophy, Kutztown University, Kutztown 19530, Pennsylvania, America)
Abstract:
Although often regarded as a relativist, Richard Rorty responded by denying it himself. In the process of response and denial, Rorty developed his view of and hope. His recent view of progress and hope for progress has gained further development and expressed two Confucian ideas in a better way. That is to say that moral progress means expanding the domain of those who we regard as “ourselves” and that we don’t have to take a position of moral universalism to make such progress. Meanwhile, Confucius and Rorty may differ first in place of distinctions in moral education and then in function of metaphysics in moral progress. And their arguments can be concluded that Rorty’s Confucianism will be a better Confucianism and that the Confucian Rorty will be a better Rorty.
KeyWords:
Rorty; relativism; progress; Confucian idea; moral metaphysics