Abstract:
Phenomenological Movement went through a turn from “purity” to “impurity” in some one century of its growth. The turn showed itself specifically by transferring from “ideal subject” to “world of life”, from “monologue” to “dialogue” and from “superhistory” to “history”. What set people thinking is that, pure or impure, philosophy preserves its profound rationale. Thus, the dispute over “purity and impurity” between seemingly quite adversary philosophic trends is actually mutually complementary in the dialogue. And the establishment of this relation of dialogue depends completely upon a practical removal of opposition between “discourse of power” and “public realm”, which is absolutely necessary both theoretically and practically.
