哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
康德哲学研究
孟子性善论与康德善良意志论之比较
PDF下载 ()
戴 兆 国
(安徽师范大学 马克思主义学院, 安徽 芜湖 241001)
戴兆国,男,安徽宣城人,哲学博士,安徽师范大学马克思主义学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
孟子提出的性善论是儒家道德哲学的理论基石,为儒家德性伦理的演进奠定了基础。康德的善良意志论是其道德哲学理论大厦的中轴,以此为基础展开的义务论对西方道德哲学的现代发展影响深远。这两种理论在对人性能力的取舍、向善路径的选择和至善目标的设定等方面均有不同思考的进路。
关键词:
孟子; 性善论; 康德; 善良意志论
收稿日期:
2018-06-19
中图分类号:
B222.5;B516.31
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2018)05-0083-09
基金项目:
安徽省社会科学规划项目(AHSKY2016D125)
Doi:
The Comparison of Mencius’ Theory of Good Nature and Kant’s Theory of Good Will
DAI Zhaoguo
(School of Marxism, Anhui Normal University, Wuhu 241001, Anhui)
Abstract:
Mencius’ theory of good nature is the theoretical cornerstone of Confucian moral philosophy, laying the foundation for the evolution of Confucian virtue ethics. Kant’s theory of good will is the center of his theory of moral philosophy theory. The theory of obligation based on this theory has a farreaching influence on the modern development of western moral philosophy. These two theories have different ways of thinking about the choice of human ability, the choice of the good path and the setting of the best goal.
KeyWords:
Mencius; theory of good nature; Kant; theory of good will