哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
教育学研究
论大学自治
PDF下载 ()
湛中乐, 尹婷
(北京大学 法学院, 北京 100871)
湛中乐,男,湖南汨罗人,法学博士,北京大学法学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
大学自治并非一套既定模式,而是在学术自由理念指导下,围绕一系列核心问题展开的制度安排。我国法律并未明确规定大学自治,但《高等教育法》规定了高等学校依法自主办学。搁置自主办学与大学自治在应然层面的表述差异,以研究现实问题解决之策的态度,从我国大学治理的实践出发,会发现现代大学自治的理论积累与实践经验,能够为我们改变目前高校自主办学规范地位不高、自主程度不足、指导原则不明的现状提供借鉴。
关键词:
大学自治; 自主办学; 学术自由; 高等教育法
收稿日期:
2017-10-18
中图分类号:
G647
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2018)01-0145-09
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金教育学一般科研项目 “高校行政和学术权力的运行机制研究”(BIA100081); 北京市“十一五”规划教育科学重点课题“高等学校办学自主权与大学法人治理结构”(ADA10097)
Doi:
The Debate Between Confucian and Mohist Education Philosophy and Its Modern Conversion
HUANG Qingli
(Qingdao Institute of Educational Development, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, Shandong)
Abstract:
The debate between Confucianism and Mohism education philosophy is a main line of debate through the Chinese traditional educational culture. The dispute focus on whether the people’s and nation’s spiritual life is the rites and music or not, the people’s ethical pursuit is righteousness and profit or not, if there is fate in the life’s belief, and whether treating difference is still the same as harmony or not. The life of modern people and the modern education must face the conflict of spiritual and material life, inner seeking of the life's belief and multivalued choice. Revieing the topics of the debate which can give us classical education wisdom for the reflection to modern people’s living circumstances.The historical experience of Confucian and Mohist education which can provides reference to traditional culture education, value education and belief education in the modern education.
KeyWords:
Confucian;Mohist;the debate between Confucian and Mohist;education philosophy