哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
民法典编纂与知识产权立法
论知识产权与民法典的互动
PDF下载 ()
费 安 玲
(中国政法大学 法律硕士学院, 北京 100088)
费安玲,女,满族,北京市人,法学博士,中国政法大学法律硕士学院教授,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
在法典化国家中,知识产权自其问世始,始终与民法典存在着互动关系。其通过立法形式而表现出民法典对知识产权私权性质的体系判断和知识产权对民法典内容的充实。近代法典化思维源于罗马法的法典化思维及体系要素的思考,但受制于社会商品经济的发展水平、科学技术的发展水平尤其是人们对知识信息重要性及商品性的认识程度,近代民法法典化初萌的成果中未将人们对知识信息的创造性或创作性成果纳入其法典体系要素中。但当有关知识产权的理论和实践面对“权利”时,源于罗马法的民法典之私权理念就直接引导着知识产权的立法制度价值与功能并决定了知识产权的立法体系定位。意大利、俄罗斯等国民法典与知识产权的紧密契合式的互动值得我们关注。对我国而言,通过民法典与单行法“二元”立法结构来实现知识产权与民法典的互动是一个值得尝试的立法路径。
关键词:
民法典; 知识产权; 立法形式
收稿日期:
2016-12-26
中图分类号:
D923; D923.4
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2017)02-0020-12
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金项目“罗马法与中国民法法典化研究”(15BFX104)
Doi:
On the Interaction Between Intellectual Property Right and the Civil Code
FEI Anling
(School of Juris Master, China University of Political Science and Law, Beijing 100088)
Abstract:
In codified countries, with the advent of intellectual property rights, it has been interactive with the civil codes rights along, which reveals the private attribute of intellectual property right judged systematically by the civil codes and the improvement in the contents of the civil codes conversely brought by intellectual property right through its legislative form. The concept of modern codification originates from Roman law and its deliberation on the essential system elements of codification. However, limited to the state of the socialized commodity economy, science and technology, and especially the lack of awareness of the importance and the commodification of intellectual information, it is difficult for the modern civil codes, which acquired initial success in the beginning period of codification, to embrace the creativity or the creative achievements of intellectual information obtained by people into their code systems. While the pertinent theories and practice pursuant to intellectual property rights confront with rights, the idea of private rights rooted in the civil code of Roman law on one hand directly conducts the value and function of legislative institution of the intellectual property right, on the other hand it determines the position of the legislative system of intellectual property right. It is worthy to distract our attention to the closely fit interaction between the civil codes and the intellectual property rights from other countries such as Italy, Russia. And for China, it is a mentionable legislative approach to establish an interactive relationship between our civil code and intellectual property rights in a mode of the dual legislative system of the civil code and the specific law.
KeyWords:
civil code; intellectual property right; legislative form