哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
民法典编纂与知识产权立法
中国民法典制定背景下知识产权立法的选择
PDF下载 ()
易 继 明
(北京大学 法学院, 北京 100871)
易继明,男,湖北荆州人,法学博士,北京大学法学院教授、国际知识产权研究中心主任,博士研究生导师。
摘要:
2017年3月《中华人民共和国民法总则》通过,与物权、债权、继承等一样,其对知识产权也进行了概括性规定。对于民法典编纂而言,知识产权与民法典之间采取分离式、纳入式、链接式或者糅合式等4种连接方式的选择,归根到底就是知识产权法整体纳入民法典“入典”独立成编或者是制定专门知识产权法典单独“成典”这两种立法模式的选择。囿于历史和时代局限,近代自然法运动的法典成就在现代社会出现了危机。因应这一危机,需要回归自然理性的法典传统,循着私人生活的形式理性主义建立起统一的私法典。“入典”与“成典”之间,没有第三条道路。知识产权法整体纳入式的“入典”模式,既是知识产权制度自身的体系化,也是现代民法典不断自我完善的过程。
关键词:
民法典; 知识产权法典; “入典”模式; “成典”模式; 立法选择
收稿日期:
2016-12-21
中图分类号:
D923; D923.4
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2017)02-0005-15
基金项目:
Doi:
The Choice of Intellectual Property Legislation in the Background of the Chinese Civil Code
YI Jiming
(Law School, Peking University, Beijing 100871)
Abstract:
In March 2017, “General Principles of the Civil Law of the People’s Republic of China” passed into law which provided general rules for intellectual property rights, just like property right, creditor’s rights, inheritance and so on. For the codification of civil law, the choice of four connection modes between intellectual property and civil code including separation type, takein type, linking type and blending type, in the final analysis, is the choice of two legislative models: one makes intellectual property law as a whole incorporated into the Civil Code as a single part, while another develops specialized intellectual property code. Confined to the limitations of history and the times, the achievements of the modern natural law movement encounters crisis in the modern society.In response to this crisis, we need to return to the natural rationality of the tradition of codification, in order to establish a unified private code following the formal rationalism of private life. There is no third way between “into the code” mode and the “codification” mode.However, bringing intellectual property law as a whole into the civil code, the “into the code” model can realize both the systematization of intellectual property itself, but also the continuous improvement of a modern civil code.
KeyWords:
Civil Code; intellectual property code; “Into the Code” mode; “Codification” mode; legislative choice