Abstract:
Basically speaking, the mainstream of Sinoaesthetics abandoned essentialism in the 21st century. Karl Marx’s thoughts on the rules of beauty lost its status as the classic origin for aesthetics. However, the reflection and critique of practicalaesthetics still responds to the questions on the essence of beauty and Marxist thoughts on the rules of beauty, and develops this field further. These responses constitute the drive to interpret deeply Marxist aesthetics. The rules of beauty, liberal labor and human nature form a trinitarian structure. This structure and its transcendence not only reveal the reasonable essence of aesthetics and the system of neopracticalesthetics which is led by this essence, but also offer a spiritual paradigm of a TrueGoodBeautiful perspective to resist modern nihilism.