哲学社会科学版
陕西师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)
哲学研究
“存在之思”还是“实践变革”?
PDF下载 ()
刘 贵 祥
(兰州大学 哲学社会学院, 甘肃 兰州 730000)
刘贵祥,男,甘肃文县人,哲学博士,兰州大学哲学社会学院副教授。
摘要:
海德格尔并没有专门研究过马克思,但对马克思却有不少评论,这些评论立足于其自身的思想主题,围绕马克思哲学和黑格尔哲学之间的关系展开,内容涉及马克思学说和形而上学、人道主义、虚无主义、理论与实践的关系等马克思主义哲学的核心话题和问题域。海德格尔的评论构成了深化马克思主义哲学研究必须面对的挑战和话题。通过分析海德格尔论马克思的五个核心命题,旨在说明海德格尔误读马克思的根源在于他错失马克思哲学的存在论革命。面对现代性带来的虚无主义问题,马克思的“实践变革”可能要比海德格尔的“存在之思”更具可行性。
关键词:
海德格尔; 马克思; 存在之思; 形而上学; 人道主义; 虚无主义; 实践变革
收稿日期:
2014-05-18
中图分类号:
B516.54文献标识码: A
文献标识码:
A
文章编号:
1672-4283(2015)05-0100-15
基金项目:
国家社会科学基金项目(15BZX014); 兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金(15LZUJBWZY087)
Doi:
“Thinking of Existence” or “Transformation of Practice”
LIU Guixiang
(Philosophy and Sociology School, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu)
Abstract:
Heidegger never made special studies of Marx, but offered considerable comments on him. Based on his own theoretical themes, Heidegger’s comments involved Marx’s theories and key issues and problematic areas of Marxist philosophy, including metaphysics, humanitarianism, nihilism and relationship between theory and practice and discussed the relationship between Marx and Hegel, which exposed the challenges and issues facing the deepening of Marxist philosophy studies. This study, by analyzing Heidegger’s five selected key propositions of Marx, aims to point out the origin of his misinterpretation of Marx results from his negligence of the existential revolution in Marxist philosophy. Moreover, in face of nihilism brought about by modernity, Marx’s “transformation of practice” proves to be more operable than Heidegger’s “thinking of existence”.
KeyWords:
Heidegger; Marx; thinking of existence; metaphysics; humanitarianism; nihilism; transformation of practice